Psychology Doing the Experiment Again for Similarities

What you'll learn to practise: define and utilize the scientific method to psychology

Scientists are engaged in explaining and understanding how the world around them works, and they are able to do and then by coming up with theories that generate hypotheses that are testable and falsifiable. Theories that stand up to their tests are retained and refined, while those that do not are discarded or modified. In this way, research enables scientists to separate fact from unproblematic opinion. Having good information generated from research aids in making wise decisions both in public policy and in our personal lives. In this section, you lot'll meet how psychologists employ the scientific method to written report and empathise behavior.

Learning Objectives

• Explain the steps of the scientific method
• Draw why the scientific method is important to psychology
• Summarize the processes of informed consent and debriefing
• Explain how research involving humans or animals is regulated

Scientific research is a disquisitional tool for successfully navigating our circuitous globe. Without it, we would be forced to rely solely on intuition, other people's authority, and blind luck. While many of us experience confident in our abilities to decipher and collaborate with the world around us, history is filled with examples of how very wrong we can be when we fail to recognize the demand for testify in supporting claims. At diverse times in history, we would accept been certain that the sunday revolved effectually a flat globe, that the globe'due south continents did not move, and that mental disease was caused past possession (Effigy 1). It is through systematic scientific inquiry that we divest ourselves of our preconceived notions and superstitions and gain an objective understanding of ourselves and our earth.

Figure 1. Some of our ancestors, beyond the world and over the centuries, believed that trephination—the practice of making a hole in the skull, as shown here—allowed evil spirits to get out the body, thus curing mental disease and other disorders. (credit: "taiproject"/Flickr)

The goal of all scientists is to better understand the world around them. Psychologists focus their attention on understanding behavior, as well as the cerebral (mental) and physiological (torso) processes that underlie behavior. In contrast to other methods that people use to empathise the behavior of others, such as intuition and personal experience, the hallmark of scientific research is that there is evidence to support a claim. Scientific knowledge is empirical: Information technology is grounded in objective, tangible prove that can be observed fourth dimension and fourth dimension once again, regardless of who is observing.

While behavior is observable, the heed is not. If someone is crying, nosotros can see behavior. However, the reason for the behavior is more difficult to make up one's mind. Is the person crying due to being sad, in pain, or happy? Sometimes we can learn the reason for someone'south beliefs by just asking a question, like "Why are you crying?" However, there are situations in which an private is either uncomfortable or unwilling to answer the question honestly, or is incapable of answering. For example, infants would not be able to explain why they are crying. In such circumstances, the psychologist must be creative in finding ways to better understand beliefs. This module explores how scientific knowledge is generated, and how important that noesis is in forming decisions in our personal lives and in the public domain.

Effort Information technology

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2695

The Process of Scientific Research

Figure 2. The scientific method is a procedure for gathering data and processing information. Information technology provides well-defined steps to standardize how scientific knowledge is gathered through a logical, rational problem-solving method.

Scientific knowledge is advanced through a process known equally the scientific method. Basically, ideas (in the form of theories and hypotheses) are tested confronting the real earth (in the grade of empirical observations), and those empirical observations pb to more ideas that are tested against the real world, and so on.

The basic steps in the scientific method are:

• Detect a natural phenomenon and define a question about it
• Make a hypothesis, or potential solution to the question
• Test the hypothesis
• If the hypothesis is true, detect more evidence or find counter-show
• If the hypothesis is false, create a new hypothesis or endeavour again
• Draw conclusions and repeat--the scientific method is never-ending, and no result is e'er considered perfect

In society to ask an important question that may improve our agreement of the world, a researcher must first notice natural phenomena. By making observations, a researcher can define a useful question. After finding a question to respond, the researcher can then brand a prediction (a hypothesis) about what he or she thinks the answer will be. This prediction is usually a argument about the relationship between 2 or more than variables. Later on making a hypothesis, the researcher will then pattern an experiment to test his or her hypothesis and evaluate the data gathered. These data will either support or refute the hypothesis. Based on the conclusions drawn from the data, the researcher will then detect more evidence to back up the hypothesis, look for counter-evidence to further strengthen the hypothesis, revise the hypothesis and create a new experiment, or proceed to contain the information gathered to answer the enquiry question.

The Bones Principles of the Scientific Method

Ii fundamental concepts in the scientific approach are theory and hypothesis. A theory is a well-developed set up of ideas that advise an explanation for observed phenomena that can be used to make predictions about future observations. A hypothesis is a testable prediction that is arrived at logically from a theory. It is often worded as an if-then statement (e.g., if I study all night, I volition go a passing grade on the exam). The hypothesis is extremely important considering information technology bridges the gap between the realm of ideas and the real world. As specific hypotheses are tested, theories are modified and refined to reflect and incorporate the result of these tests (Figure ii).

Effort It

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2699

Effigy three. The scientific method of research includes proposing hypotheses, conducting research, and creating or modifying theories based on results.

Other primal components in following the scientific method include verifiability, predictability, falsifiability, and fairness. Verifiability means that an experiment must be replicable past another researcher. To accomplish verifiability, researchers must make certain to document their methods and clearly explain how their experiment is structured and why it produces certain results.

Predictability in a scientific theory implies that the theory should enable us to make predictions about hereafter events. The precision of these predictions is a measure out of the forcefulness of the theory.

Falsifiability refers to whether a hypothesis can disproved. For a hypothesis to exist falsifiable, information technology must be logically possible to brand an ascertainment or exercise a physical experiment that would prove that at that place is no support for the hypothesis. Even when a hypothesis cannot be shown to be imitation, that does non necessarily mean it is not valid. Future testing may disprove the hypothesis. This does not hateful that a hypothesis has to be shown to be imitation, just that it can be tested.

To determine whether a hypothesis is supported or not supported, psychological researchers must conduct hypothesis testing using statistics. Hypothesis testing is a blazon of statistics that determines the probability of a hypothesis existence true or false. If hypothesis testing reveals that results were "statistically significant," this means that there was support for the hypothesis and that the researchers can be reasonably confident that their result was non due to random chance. If the results are not statistically pregnant, this means that the researchers' hypothesis was non supported.

Fairness implies that all information must be considered when evaluating a hypothesis. A researcher cannot pick and cull what information to go on and what to discard or focus specifically on data that support or practise not support a particular hypothesis. All data must exist accounted for, even if they invalidate the hypothesis.

Try Information technology

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2694

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2697

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2698

Applying the Scientific Method

To come across how this process works, allow's consider a specific theory and a hypothesis that might exist generated from that theory. Equally you'll learn in a later module, the James-Lange theory of emotion asserts that emotional experience relies on the physiological arousal associated with the emotional state. If you walked out of your domicile and discovered a very aggressive ophidian waiting on your doorstep, your eye would begin to race and your stomach churn. Co-ordinate to the James-Lange theory, these physiological changes would effect in your feeling of fright. A hypothesis that could be derived from this theory might be that a person who is unaware of the physiological arousal that the sight of the ophidian elicits will non feel fearfulness.

Remember that a proficient scientific hypothesis is  falsifiable, or capable of being shown to be wrong. Recall from the introductory module that Sigmund Freud had lots of interesting ideas to explain diverse human behaviors (Figure 3). However, a major criticism of Freud'south theories is that many of his ideas are not falsifiable; for example, it is impossible to imagine empirical observations that would disprove the beingness of the id, the ego, and the superego—the three elements of personality described in Freud's theories. Despite this, Freud's theories are widely taught in introductory psychology texts considering of their historical significance for personality psychology and psychotherapy, and these remain the root of all modern forms of therapy.

Effigy 4. Many of the specifics of (a) Freud'southward theories, such every bit (b) his division of the heed into id, ego, and superego, have fallen out of favor in recent decades because they are non falsifiable. In broader strokes, his views set the stage for much of psychological thinking today, such as the unconscious nature of the majority of psychological processes.

In contrast, the James-Lange theory does generate falsifiable hypotheses, such as the 1 described above. Some individuals who endure significant injuries to their spinal columns are unable to feel the bodily changes that frequently back-trail emotional experiences. Therefore, we could test the hypothesis by determining how emotional experiences differ between individuals who have the ability to detect these changes in their physiological arousal and those who do non. In fact, this research has been conducted and while the emotional experiences of people deprived of an awareness of their physiological arousal may be less intense, they yet experience emotion (Chwalisz, Diener, & Gallagher, 1988).

Try It

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2696

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2700

Link to Learning

Desire to participate in a study? Visit this Psychological Research on the Net website and click on a link that sounds interesting to you in order to participate in online enquiry.

Why the Scientific Method Is Important for Psychology

The apply of the scientific method is 1 of the master features that separates mod psychology from earlier philosophical inquiries well-nigh the mind. Compared to chemistry, physics, and other "natural sciences," psychology has long been considered i of the "social sciences" considering of the subjective nature of the things information technology seeks to study. Many of the concepts that psychologists are interested in—such equally aspects of the human heed, behavior, and emotions—are subjective and cannot exist directly measured. Psychologists frequently rely instead on behavioral observations and self-reported data, which are considered past some to exist illegitimate or defective in methodological rigor. Applying the scientific method to psychology, therefore, helps to standardize the approach to understanding its very dissimilar types of information.

The scientific method allows psychological data to be replicated and confirmed in many instances, under different circumstances, and by a diversity of researchers. Through replication of experiments, new generations of psychologists tin can reduce errors and broaden the applicability of theories. It also allows theories to be tested and validated instead of just being conjectures that could never be verified or falsified. All of this allows psychologists to gain a stronger understanding of how the human mind works.

Scientific articles published in journals and psychology papers written in the style of the American Psychological Association (i.e., in "APA style") are structured effectually the scientific method. These papers include an Introduction, which introduces the background information and outlines the hypotheses; a Methods department, which outlines the specifics of how the experiment was conducted to exam the hypothesis; a Results section, which includes the statistics that tested the hypothesis and state whether it was supported or not supported, and a Give-and-take and Conclusion, which state the implications of finding back up for, or no support for, the hypothesis. Writing manufactures and papers that attach to the scientific method makes it easy for future researchers to repeat the study and attempt to replicate the results.

Today, scientists agree that adept research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human being dignity and safety. However, as yous will read in the Tuskegee Syphilis Report, this has non always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically audio. This section presents how upstanding considerations affect the blueprint and implementation of research conducted today.

Research Involving Human Participants

Whatever experiment involving the participation of human subjects is governed by all-encompassing, strict guidelines designed to ensure that the experiment does non result in harm. Any enquiry establishment that receives federal support for research involving human participants must have access to an institutional review board (IRB). The IRB is a committee of individuals often made up of members of the institution'south administration, scientists, and community members (Effigy 1). The purpose of the IRB is to review proposals for research that involves human participants. The IRB reviews these proposals with the principles mentioned in a higher place in listen, and by and large, blessing from the IRB is required in order for the experiment to proceed.

Figure five. An institution's IRB meets regularly to review experimental proposals that involve homo participants. (credit: modification of work by Lowndes Surface area Knowledge Commutation (LAKE)/Flickr)

An institution'due south IRB requires several components in any experiment it approves. For one, each participant must sign an informed consent form before they tin can participate in the experiment. An informed consent grade provides a written description of what participants can expect during the experiment, including potential risks and implications of the inquiry. Information technology also lets participants know that their involvement is completely voluntary and can be discontinued without penalty at any fourth dimension. Furthermore, the informed consent guarantees that any data collected in the experiment volition remain completely confidential. In cases where enquiry participants are under the age of 18, the parents or legal guardians are required to sign the informed consent class.

While the informed consent form should be every bit honest as possible in describing exactly what participants volition be doing, sometimes deception is necessary to prevent participants' knowledge of the exact research question from affecting the results of the study. Deception involves purposely misleading experiment participants in order to maintain the integrity of the experiment, only non to the point where the deception could exist considered harmful. For example, if we are interested in how our opinion of someone is affected by their attire, nosotros might apply charade in describing the experiment to prevent that knowledge from affecting participants' responses. In cases where deception is involved, participants must receive a total debriefing upon determination of the study—complete, honest information about the purpose of the experiment, how the information collected volition be used, the reasons why deception was necessary, and information well-nigh how to obtain boosted information about the study.

Endeavour Information technology

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2702

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2703

Dig Deeper: Ethics and the Tuskegee Syphilis Written report

Unfortunately, the upstanding guidelines that be for research today were not ever applied in the past. In 1932, poor, rural, black, male sharecroppers from Tuskegee, Alabama, were recruited to participate in an experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service, with the aim of studying syphilis in black men (Effigy 2). In commutation for gratuitous medical care, meals, and burial insurance, 600 men agreed to participate in the study. A little more than half of the men tested positive for syphilis, and they served as the experimental group (given that the researchers could not randomly assign participants to groups, this represents a quasi-experiment). The remaining syphilis-gratis individuals served every bit the command group. However, those individuals that tested positive for syphilis were never informed that they had the affliction.

While in that location was no treatment for syphilis when the report began, by 1947 penicillin was recognized every bit an constructive treatment for the disease. Despite this, no penicillin was administered to the participants in this report, and the participants were non immune to seek treatment at whatever other facilities if they continued in the study. Over the grade of 40 years, many of the participants unknowingly spread syphilis to their wives (and subsequently their children born from their wives) and eventually died because they never received treatment for the disease. This study was discontinued in 1972 when the experiment was discovered past the national press (Tuskegee University, north.d.). The resulting outrage over the experiment led directly to the National Research Act of 1974 and the strict ethical guidelines for inquiry on humans described in this chapter. Why is this written report unethical? How were the men who participated and their families harmed every bit a office of this research?

Figure 6. A participant in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study receives an injection.

Enquiry Involving Animal Subjects

Many psychologists conduct research involving animal subjects. Often, these researchers use rodents (Effigy three) or birds equally the subjects of their experiments—the APA estimates that ninety% of all animal research in psychology uses these species (American Psychological Association, northward.d.). Because many basic processes in animals are sufficiently similar to those in humans, these animals are adequate substitutes for inquiry that would be considered unethical in human participants.

Effigy 7. Rats, similar the i shown hither, often serve as the subjects of fauna research.

This does not hateful that animal researchers are allowed to ethical concerns. Indeed, the humane and upstanding handling of animal research subjects is a critical attribute of this type of research. Researchers must design their experiments to minimize whatsoever hurting or distress experienced past animals serving as research subjects.

Whereas IRBs review research proposals that involve homo participants, beast experimental proposals are reviewed by an Institutional Fauna Care and Use Committee (IACUC). An IACUC consists of institutional administrators, scientists, veterinarians, and community members. This committee is charged with ensuring that all experimental proposals require the humane treatment of fauna inquiry subjects. It besides conducts semi-annual inspections of all animate being facilities to ensure that the research protocols are being followed. No brute enquiry project can proceed without the committee'south approval.

Try Information technology

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2701f

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2704

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/2705

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/4087

Glossary

debriefing:when an experiment involved charade, participants are told complete and truthful information about the experiment at its conclusion

deception:purposely misleading experiment participants in society to maintain the integrity of the experiment

empirical:grounded in objective, tangible evidence that can be observed time and time once more, regardless of who is observing

fairness: implies that all data must be considered when evaluating a hypothesis

falsifiable:able to exist disproven by experimental results

hypothesis:(plural: hypotheses) tentative and testable statement about the relationship between two or more variables

informed consent:process of informing a research participant about what to expect during an experiment, any risks involved, and the implications of the research, and then obtaining the person's consent to participate

Institutional Beast Care and Use Committee (IACUC):committee of administrators, scientists, and community members that reviews proposals for research involving animal participants

Institutional Review Board (IRB):committee of administrators, scientists, veterinarians, and customs members that reviews proposals for inquiry involving human participants

predictability: implies that a theory should enable us to make predictions nigh future events

theory:well-developed set of ideas that propose an explanation for observed phenomena

verifiability: an experiment must be replicable by another researcher

https://assessments.lumenlearning.com/assessments/4807

Licenses and Attributions

grantrusy1979.blogspot.com

Source: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-psychology/chapter/outcome-the-scientific-method/

Share this post